Metamorphic Domain-Specific Languages: A Journey Into the Shapes of a Language
External or internal domain-specific languages (DSLs) or (fluent) APIs? Whoever you are – a developer or a user of a DSL – you usually have to choose your side; you should not! What about metamorphic DSLs that change their shape according to your needs?
We report on our 4-years journey of providing the “right” support (in the domain of feature modeling), leading us to develop an external DSL, different shapes of an internal API, and maintain all these languages. A key insight is that there is no one-size-fits-all solution or no clear superiority of a solution compared to another. On the contrary, we found that it does make sense to continue the maintenance of an external and internal DSL.
The vision that we foresee for the future of software languages is their ability to be self-adaptable to the most appropriate shape (including the corresponding integrated development environment) according to a particular usage or task. We call metamorphic DSL such a language, able to change from one shape to another shape.
Wed 22 Oct Times are displayed in time zone: Tijuana, Baja California change
|13:30 - 14:15|
|In search of types|
Stephen KellUniversity of Cambridge
|14:15 - 15:00|
|Metamorphic Domain-Specific Languages: A Journey Into the Shapes of a Language|
Mathieu AcherUniversity of Rennes, Benoit CombemaleUniversity of Rennes, Philippe ColletUniversity of NiceMedia Attached